[SQM] SQM
JPDarkSkies at aol.com
JPDarkSkies at aol.com
Thu Sep 16 19:38:00 UTC 2010
re: Jaime. Thanks for bringing this down to a realistic level as I feel
that some of the quoted figures for dark sites are higher than I would
expect.
On the subject of cloud. I am involved with a DS survey and I use my back
garden as a starting calibration point before starting a survey trip. I
normally get a SQM-L reading of 21.4 but on one, only one, occasion I was
getting varying readings up to 21.7. I also noted very high tenuous cloud
and assumed that there was a blanketing effect. As I could make out the
cloud I would have expected a lowering of the readings but possibly, I could not
actually see the cloud but see the star background changing.
Has anyone else seen this effect? John P.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://unihedron.com/pipermail/sqm/attachments/20100916/700bd8bc/attachment.htm
More information about the sqm
mailing list